Lalit Kumar and Ors. v. State of Hp and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court closed the execution petition after the respondents submitted instructions deciding to extend benefits from CWP No. 342 of 2021, subject to scrutiny of records within six weeks. The court allowed revival of proceedings if directives are not complied with.
What did the court decide?
The execution petition was closed; respondents directed to scrutinize records and extend similar reliefs under the Yashwant Singh judgment within six weeks.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Execution Petition No.339 of 2023 in CWP No.1148 of 2021
Decided on: 5th December, 2023
___________________________________________________________ Lalit Kumar and others ....Petitioners
Versus
State of Himachal Pradesh ……Respondents and another
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge
1 Whether approved for reporting?
| For the petitioners: | Ms. Mr. |
Tim Saran, Pawan K. Sharma |
Advocate vice , Advocate. |
|---|---|---|---|
| For the respondents: | Mr. Gen |
B.C. Verma, Add eral. |
itional Advocate |
Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral)
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents should extend benefits analogous to CWP No. 342 of 2021 to the petitioners.
Whether the execution petition can be closed subject to future compliance.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Lalit Kumar and others
- respondent
State of Himachal Pradesh
Coram
Ranjan Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- EX.P./339/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court