The writ petitioner was permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh. The writ petition and pending miscellaneous applications were disposed of following withdrawal.
Petitioner permitted to withdraw writ petition with liberty to file afresh; petition and pending miscellaneous applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No. 5005 of 2023 Decided on: 5th December, 2023
__________________________________________________________ Engineer Bhagat Ram ....Petitioner Versus Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited ……Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge
1 Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Raj Pal Singh Thakur, Advocate.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral)
After hearing the matter for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition, with liberty to file afresh, if so desired.
(Ranjan Sharma)
Judge
December 05, 2023
(himani)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Engineer Bhagat Ram
Himachal Pradesh State Electricity Board Limited
Ranjan Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
