The petition was closed as the petitioners were regularly regularized with effect from 29.11.2023 pursuant to a previous order, leaving no matter for adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No.204 of 2023 Decided on: 04th December, 2023
_______________________________________________________ Kamal Kishore & ors. ....Petitioners Versus State of Himachal Pradesh & ors. ….Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ranjan Sharma, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Mr. Nitin Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocate General.
Ranjan Sharma, Judge (Oral)
In terms of the previous order dated 30.11.2023, since the petitioners have been regularized w.e.f. 29.11.2023, Mr. Nitin Thakur, learned counsel states that nothing remains to be adjudicated.
Accordingly, the petition is closed, so also the
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
pending miscellaneous application(s).
(Ranjan Sharma) December 04, 2023 Judge (Shivender)
Kamal Kishore
State of Himachal Pradesh
Ranjan Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
