Disposed
Santo Devi v. State of Hp and Others
Himachal Pradesh HCCWP/559/2020
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.559 of 2020 Decided on: 16th December, 2022 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Santo Devi …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. Tijender Singh, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Ms. Ritta Goswami, Additional Advocate General with Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Assistant Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 5-State.
Mr. Ashok Kumar Tyagi, Advocate, for respondent No.6.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
This writ petition has been filed for grant of
following substantive reliefs:-
1 Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.
2
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is under instructions to withdraw the present writ petition at this stage with liberty to seek appropriate remedy for challenging the income certificates issued to the petitioner and private respondent No.6 before the competent authority in accordance with law. Learned counsel further submits that the time bonafidely spent by the petitioner in pursuing the present writ petition may be ordered to be excluded in computation of limitation period.
In view of the aforesaid prayer of the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with leave and liberty, as prayed for. Having regard to the totality of facts & circumstances and in the interest of justice, it is ordered that the time spent by the petitioner in pursuing the instant writ petition shall not be computed towards limitation. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
December 16, 2022 Mukesh
Santo Devi
State of H.P.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court