Petitioner in custody petitioned for bail under Section 439 CrPC and sought to withdraw the petition with liberty to approach the trial court. The court allowed the withdrawal.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to approach the trial court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No. 2711 of 2022 Decided on: 16.12.2022 Santosh Kumar ...…Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …… Respondent ……………………………………………………………………………… Coram Hon’ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Assistant Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Petitioner, presently in custody, as an accused in FIR No.15/2022, dated 22.01.2022, registered under Sections 39(1)(a)(c), 47 & 50 of the Himachal Pradesh Excise Act and Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 304 and 120-B of India Penal Code, at Police Station Sundernagar, District Mandi H.P., is seeking regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
2
prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also
stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge
16th December 2022 (rohit)
SantoshKumar
State of Himachal Pradesh
JyotsnaRewalDua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
