In a bail application regarding an FIR under Section 302 IPC, the petitioner applied to withdraw the petition and postpone the matter to the Trial Court. The High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn and disposed of pending applications.
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No.2636 of 2022 Decided on: 9th December, 2022
_________________________________________________________________ Akhil Sood ....Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh …Respondent ________________________________________________________________ Coram_ Hon'ble Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Nikhil Chugh, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Ram Lal Thakur, Assistant Advocate General.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
The petitioner prays for his enlargement on bail in FIR No.165 of 2021, dated 19.09.2020, registered under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code at Police Station Theog, District Shimla, H.P.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner intends to approach the learned Trial Court in the first instance. He, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Prayer is not opposed. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
application(s), if any, also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge December 9, 2022 R.Atal
Akhil Sood
State of Himachal Pradesh
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
