The Court dismissed the execution petition declaring it infructuous due to full compliance of the implemented order by the respondent.
Petition dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Ex. P No.49 of 2021. Date of decision: 04.08.2021.
Umeshwer Prakash …..petitioner. Versus H.R.T.C and another …..Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioner : Mr. Manohar Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Vikas Rajput , Advocate. (Through Video Conferencing)
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
In view of statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the order sought to be implemented herein have been fully complied with, as such the present petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. In case the petitioner has still any subsisting grievance, he is at liberty to approach this Court for redressal of his grievances by reviving this very execution petition.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
04 August, 2021 tarun
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the Judgment?Yes
2
(tm/tarun)
Umeshwer Prakash
H.R.T.C
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
