Rajeshwari Gupta v. State of Hp and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.…
COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
CWP No. 780 of 2019 Decided on: August 3, 2021
____________________________________________________________ Rajeshwari Gupta .. Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others … Respondents.
____________________________________________________________ Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting1 ? No.
____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner :Mr. Mohan Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents :Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Mr. Hemanshu Mishra, Additional Advocate Generals for respondents No. 1 to 4.
Respondent No. 5 already ex-parte.
____________________________________ Tarlok Singh Chauhan, J. (Oral)
The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for the grant of following substantive relief:
"i) That result of the interview held on 12.11.2014 for the post of the Lecturer History at GSSS Katwachi, Tehsil Thunag, District Mandi, HP may kindly be ordered to be declared so that any of the successful candidate may get the appointment."
1Whether reporters of the Local papers are allowed to see the judgment? .
2
declaration of the result is only academic. Accordingly, this court is
not inclined to entertain this case.
petition and the same is disposed of, so also the pending
application(s), if any.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
( Satyen Vaidya ) Judge
3rd August, 2021
tm
Rajeshwari Gupta
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court