Cr.M.P(M) No. 124 of 2020: Condonation of 1 year, 16 months and 15 days delay in filing appeal allowed; application disposed. Cr. Appeal No. of 2021: Admitted; bail bonds ordered.
Delay of 1 year, 16 months and 15 days condoned. Appeal admitted. Bail bonds in sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety directed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr. Appeal No. of 2021
03.08.2021
Present: Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate for the applicant.
Mr. Bhup Singh Thakur, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Ashok Sharma, Advocate General with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Deputy Advocate General for respondent No.3.
(Through video conferencing)
Cr.M.P(M) No. 124 of 2020
Learned Additional Advocate General on
instructions states that the State has not filed any independent appeal.
For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavit of applicant, we find sufficient cause having been carved out for condonation of delay. Accordingly, the delay of 1 year, 16 months and 15 days in filing of appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No. of 2021
Admit .
Bail bonds in the sum of Rs.20,000/- with one surety of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the trial Court be furnished by the respondents-accused undertaking therein to appear in this Court as and when directed and to receive the sentence which may be imposed on conclusion of the appeal.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the 1 year, 16 months and 15 days delay in filing appeal is condonable.
Whether the appeal should be admitted.
Applicant
Respondents
Respondent No.3
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
