The court recorded that the impugned order stands complied with and issued no further orders in this compliance matter. The decision does not establish any principle of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Ex. Petition No. 222 of 2021
31.08.2021 Present:
Mr. H.R. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Ms. Shubh Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the respondents states that the
order in question stands complied with, therefore, no further orders are required to be passed in this matter.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya) Judge
August 31, 2021 (himani/sanjeev)
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
