Petitioner was granted leave to withdraw and the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous due to his retirement. The pending application, if any, was also disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 480/2020 Decided on : 2.8.2021
Krishan Gopal …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & ors. ….Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 No
For the Petitioner: Mr. Hoshiar Kaushal, Advocate.
For the respondent: Mr. Ashok Sharma, A.G. with Mr. Rajinder Dogra, Sr. Addl. A.G., Mr. Vinod Thakur,Mr. Hemanshu Misra, Mr. Shiv Pal Manhans, Addl. A.Gs., and Mr. Bhupinder Thakur, Dy.A.G.
(Video Conferencing)
Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (oral)
Since the petitioner has retired, therefore, the instant petition seeking quashing of impugned transfer order has been rendered infructuous and is disposed of as such, so also the pending application(s), if any.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
(Satyen Vaidya) 2.8.2021 Judge (pankaj)
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.
Krishan Gopal
State of H.P.
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Satyen Vaidya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
