Om Pardeep v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.PC as not meeting exceptional criteria for offences under the SC/ST Act. Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty was granted.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition for bail under Section 439 Cr.PC with attached status report.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
Cr.MP(M) No.1281 of 2021 Date of Decision: July 9, 2021
Om Pardeep ...Petitioner.
Versus
State of H.P. andother ...Respondent.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Anoop Chitkara, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1 NO
For the petitioner: Mr. Deepak Arora, Advocate. For the respondent: Mr. Nand Lal Thakur Addl. Advocate General, Mr. Ram Lal Thakur Deputy Advocate General, and Mr. Rajat Chauhan Law Officer, for the State.
THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCE
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable in a case punishable under the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.
Whether the petitioner is an exception falling under the category laid down in Prathvi Raj Chauhan vs. Union of India.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Om Pardeep
- respondent
State of H.P.
Coram
Anoop Chitkara
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRMPM/1281/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court