Ashok v. State of Hp and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
vs. State of H.P. and others Cr.MMO No. 508…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Raj Kumar vs. State of H.P. and others
Cr.MMO No. 508 of 2021
28.11.2022 Present: Mr. Karan Veer Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. M/s Sumesh Raj, Dinesh Thakur and Sanjeev Sood, Additional Advocate Generals with Mr. Amit Kumar Dhumal, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate for respondent No. 2. Respondents No. 3 and 4 ex parte .
On the request of learned Counsel for the petitioner,
list after two weeks.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge
November 28, 2022
(narender)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Raj Kumar
- respondent
State of H.P.
- respondent
Others
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRMMO/258/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court