In an Order dated 8.7.2021, the Judge directed the petitioners to institute a representation before the respondent within two weeks. The Court closed the contempt petition and disposed of pending applications upon these directions.
Contempt petition closed; pending applications disposed; direction to file representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
COPC (T) No.24 of 2021
Decided on : 8.7.2021
Akshya Kumar and others
…Petitioners
Versus
Sandeep Bhatnagar
…Respondent
Coram
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sureshwar Thakur, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioners : Ms. Manisha, Advocate.
For the respondent : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate.
Sureshwar Thakur, Judge
The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that since no representation exists on record of the respondent, hence the latter is precluded to render a decision thereon. Consequently, the learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to, within two weeks, institute a representation(s) before the respondent concerned. Upon the afore representation(s) of the petitioners, the latter shall, in accordance with law, make a decision thereon, by passing a speaking order. It is made clear that while
2
deciding the afore representation, the respondent concerned shall given an opportunity of personal hearing to the petitioners. In view of above, the contempt petition is closed. Also, the pending application(s), are also disposed of. No costs.
(Sureshwar Thakur) Judge
8.7.2021
Kalpana
2
Akshya Kumar and others
Sandeep Bhatnagar
Sureshwar Thakur
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
