The High Court of Himachal Pradesh condoned the delay in filing a review petition as sufficiently explained. The court found no material error on the face of the record and dismissed the petition, applying principles from Kamlesh Verma.
Review petition dismissed; pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Civil Review No.92 of 2017
Date of Decision : December 13, 2017
Raj Nand ….Petitioner. versus
State of H.P. & others …Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. For the Petitioner : Mr. Surinder Prakash Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents : Mr. Varun Chandel, Additional Advocate General and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General.
Sanjay Karol, Judge(Oral)
CMPM No.1636/2017
For the reasons set out in the application, delay of 1 year, 3 months and 16 days in filing the review petition, which, in our considered view, has sufficiently been explained, is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
Civil Review No.92 of 2017
parties.
…2…
sufficient reason so as to take in its sweep, a ground analogous to those specified in the statutory provisions. There is no material error, manifest on the face of the order, undermining its soundness or resulting into miscarriage of justice. Review is not an appeal in disguise, entitling the party to be reheard, simply because the party wants a decision to be otherwise.
disposed of.
( Sanjay Karol ), Acting Chief Justice
December 13, 2017 (sd)
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ), Judge.
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the condonation of delay in filing the review petition is permissible.
Whether any mistake or error apparent on the face of record exists to grant the review.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Kamlesh Verma Versus Mayawati and othersFollowed¶16
Kamlesh Verma Versus Mayawati and others, (2013) 8 SCC 320 · Who else cites this
Raj Nand
State of H.P.
Sanjay Karol
Tarllok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
