The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of a public interest writ petition directing the respondent authorities to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representation within three weeks.
Petitioner granted liberty to place additional material; direction to respondent to decide representation within three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.3096 of 2016 Date of decision: 30.08.2017
Gagan Singh ..Petitioner
Versus
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited & another . Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner: Mr.Lovneesh Kanwar, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Ranjan Sharma, Advocate.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record communication dated 28th August, 2017. He further states that the petitioner’s representation is pending consideration with the respondent authorities and as such, the petition be disposed of with direction to the respondent authorities to consider and decide the same expeditiously, in accordance with law.
2
additional material on record, if any. Needless to add, if the order is not in favour of the petitioner, the authority shall assign reasons while deciding the same, which shall be communicated to the petitioner. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner to approach the Court, if need so arises subsequently.
In view of the above, the petition stands disposed
of, so also the pending application(s), if any.
Copy dasti .
( Sanjay Karol ) Acting Chief Justice
August 30, 2017 ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) (vt) Judge
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the representation filed by the petitioner requires consideration and decision by the respondent authorities within a specified time frame.
Gagan Singh
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited
another
Sanjay Karol
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
