Advocate General further contended that bare perusal of order dated 27.12.2005 passed by appellate authority on the representation having been filed by respondent suggests that each and every aspect of the matter has been dealt with meticulously by the authority concerned, while considering grounds/ prayer made in the representation and as such, there is no illegality or infirmity in the same. Learned Advocate General, while referring to the impugned judgment passed by learned single Judge, forcefully contended that since order dated 15.9.1992 was passed by authority concerned before completion of probation, there was no occasion as such for the authority to hold regular inquiry as has been observed by learned single Judge. Mr. Dogra, learned Advocate General further contended that there was no occasion for the department to afford one more opportunity to clear departmental examination at par with Shri Inder Singh and Ranjit Attri, who approached Himachal Administrative Tribunal, well within time and accordingly, were afforded one more opportunity to clear the departmental examination. While concluding his arguments, Mr. Dogra, specifically invited attention of this Court to the findings returned by the learned single Judge, whereby respondent has been exempted from qualifying departmental examination, and strenuously argued that there was no occasion whatsoever, for learned single Judge to exempt the
