The High Court, in a writ petition, held that petitioner’s grievances were partly redressed and disposed of the petition with liberty to revive it.
Grievances partly redressed; petition disposed of with liberty to revive.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.7 of 2017 Date of decision: 28.6.2017
M/s Narkanda Filling Station ..Petitioner
Versus Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner & another . Respondents
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioner: Mr.Vishal Mohan, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr.Anup Rattan, Mr.Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General.
Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Undisputably, the grievances of the petitioner stand partly redressed. We are sure that if the petitioner approaches the respondent authority, the remaining grievances shall also be addressed, in accordance with law. As such, we dispose of the present petition, reserving liberty to the petitioner to revive the same, if need so arises subsequently. Pending application(s), if any, also stand(s) disposed of.
M/s Narkanda Filling Station
Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
