Disposed
Arvind Kumar v. State of Hp
Himachal Pradesh HCCWP/683/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP…
What the court decided
AI extract
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA
CWP No. 683 of 2017 Date of Decision: 29.6.2017
Arvind Kumar …..Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. and Ors. ….Respondents. Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge .
Whether approved for reporting?1
For the Petitioner: Mr. J.L. Bhardwaj, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General with Mr. Anup Rattan & Mr. Romesh Verma, Additional Advocate Generals and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General.
Sanjay Karol, ACJ. (oral)
It is not in dispute that a sum of Rs. 1,25,045/- stands deposited against the award dated 16.10.2004, passed by the learned Presiding Judge, Labour Court-cum-Industrial Tribunal, Dharamshala, H.P., in case titled as Ram Murat V. Arvind Kumar Sharma.
1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
…2…
Copy dasti .
( Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice
29th June, 2017 ( Sandeep Sharma ), Manjit Judge.
Arvind Kumar
State of H.P.
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court