A short order condoning a 71-day delay in filing an application and ordering its registration. The matter was adjourned for notice confined on a substantial question of law.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
STR No._____ of 2017
28.06.2017 Present: M/s Vishal Mohan & Varun Gupta, Advocates, for the petitioner.
Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr.J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondents-State.
OMP(M) No. 33 of 2017
For the reasons set out in the application, delay
of 71 days in filing the application, which in our considered view, has sufficiently been explained, is condoned. Application stands disposed of. Application be registered.
STR No. of 2017
At this stage, notice confined on substantial question of law (a). Mr. J.K. Verma, learned Deputy Advocate General to obtain instructions. Short affidavit, if any, be also filed before the next date of hearing.
List on 02.08.2017.
(Sanjay Karol), Acting Chief Justice.
(Sandeep Sharma), June 28, 2017 Judge. (Purohit)
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
