Krishan Lal v. State of Hp
Case brief
What is this about?
HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 702 of 2016…
HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 702 of 2016…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No. 702 of 2016 Date of decision: 12th July, 2017 Krishan Lal and another ..Petitioners Versus State of H.P. and another ..Respondents ________________________________________________________ Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice. The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting1 :
| For the Petitioners | : Mr. B.C. Negi, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Pranaya Pratap Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondents | : Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Anup Rattan, Additional Advocate General, for respondent No. 1. |
| Mr. Dilip Sharma, Senior Advocate, with | |
| Ms. Nishi Goel, counsel for respondent No. 2. |
________________________________________________________ Per Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice (oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks
permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty reserved to file afresh, based on the same as also subsequent cause of action, if need so arises. Permission granted. Liberty reserved. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. The pending applications, if any,
also stand dismissed.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice ( Sandeep Sharma ) 12th July, 2017(K) Judge
1 Whether Reporters of local newspaper are permitted to see the judgment ?
Krishan Lal and another
State of H.P.
another
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court