State of Hp v. Prittam Chand
Case brief
What is this about?
687 of 2017 22.08.2017 Present: Mr. Virender…
What did the court decide?
Leave to appeal allowed and application disposed of; appeal admitted, respondents to furnish bond to trial Court.
687 of 2017 22.08.2017 Present: Mr. Virender…
Leave to appeal allowed and application disposed of; appeal admitted, respondents to furnish bond to trial Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr. MP(M) No. 687 of 2017
22.08.2017 Present:
Mr. Virender K. Verma, Addl. AG with Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Dy. AG, for the applicant/ appellant.
Mr. Amit Jamwal, Advocate, vice Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advocate, for the nonapplicants/respondents.
Cr. MP(M) No. 687 of 2017
Heard. After going through the record, this Court
finds that the applicant has an arguable case and there are
certain points involved in the appeal which needs consideration. In view of this, the present application for leave to appeal is allowed and is accordingly disposed of.
Cr. Appeal No.
Appeal be registered .
Admit.
Respondents to furnish personal bond to the
tune of ` 10,000/- each, with one surety in the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court, within a period of eight weeks, undertaking therein to appear in this Court as and when directed and in the event of allowing the appeal, the respondents will surrender before the Court to undergo sentence, if any, imposed by this Court.
Copy dasti .
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge 22nd August, 2017 (raman)
The Applicant
The Respondents
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court