Plaintiff withdrew the suit via counsel's instructions. Court dismissed the suit as withdrawn, granted liberty to file afresh, and ordered refund of court fee.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file afresh granted; court fee refunded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Civil Suit No. 4047 of 2013 Decided on: 21.08.2017
M/s Total Health Care …..Plaintiff
Versus
M/s Aarmed Formulation Private Limited & others
……Defendants
______________________________________________________________ Coram_ The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge. 1 Whether approved for reporting? No.
For the plaintiff : Mr. Sanjay K. Sharma, Advocate. For the defendants : None. _________________________________________________________________
Chander Bhusan Barowalia, Judge (oral)
At this stage, learned counsel for the plaintiff on instructions received from his client, states that due to subsequent events, the plaintiff does not want to continue with the present suit and he may be allowed to withdraw the present suit with liberty to file afresh, as and when required.
(Chander Bhusan Barowalia) Judge
21st August, 2017 (raman)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes
2
Chander Bhusan Barowalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
