Vikas Chauhan v. Prabodh Saxena and Others
Case brief
What is this about?
the reporters of the local papers may be…
the reporters of the local papers may be…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
COPC No. 109 of 2017 Decided on: May 25, 2017 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dr. Vikas Chauhan …………….Petitioner Versus Sh. Parbodh Saxena and others ……….Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
| --------------------------------------------- For the petitioner : Mr. |
-------------------------- Sanjeev Bhusha |
-------- n, S |
------ enior |
|---|---|---|---|
| Advo Kaun |
cate with Ms. dal, Advocate. |
Abhi | lasha |
| For the respondents : Mr. Gene |
Shrawan Dogra, ral with Mr. Anup |
Adv Rattan |
ocate and |
| Mr. | Romesh Verma, |
Addit | ional |
| Advo | cate Generals and | Mr. | J.K. |
| Verm --------------------------------------------- Justice Sanjay Karol, Acting Chief |
a, Deputy Advocate -------------------------- Justice (oral): |
Genera -------- |
l. ------ |
Learned Advocate General, under instructions from Mr. Baldev Kumar, Director, Health Services, states that Regional Hospital, Chamba, otherwise falls under the “urban area/ municipal committee area Chamba, and, not, as is so alleged, within, “Chamba-Phukari, Choori, Kihar, Samote.” He further clarifies that Pukhari is a Medical Block in District Chamba. It is further pointed out from the written instructions that aforesaid hospital is not included in the list of hard/difficult/
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? .
2
tribal/ backward areas in Policy dated 20.3.2017, for the purpose
of granting weightage of incentive marks.
respondents to be contumacious, in any manner, as such, we close the present proceedings.
(Sanjay Karol) Acting Chief Justice
(Sandeep Sharma) Judge
May 25, 2017
(vikrant)
Dr. Vikas Chauhan
Sh. Parbodh Saxena
Sanjay Karol
Sandeep Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court