Gangi Devi v. Gokal
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal withdrawn; discharge liberty to pursue remedy before First Appellate Court. Appeal dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to pursue remedy before the learned First Appellate Court under Order IX of the C.P.C.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CMP(M) No. 474 of 2017 Decided on: 31.10.2017
Smt. Gangi Devi & Ors. …Petitioners Versus Gokal ...Respondent Coram
The Hon’ble Mr.Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioners: Mr. Inderjit Singh Narwal, Advocate For the respondent: Mr. Sanjeev Kuthiala and Ms. Kamlesh Kumari, Advocates.
Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral)
Mr. Inderjit Singh Narwal, learned Advocate, states that he
has instructions to not press the instant appeal and pursue his remedy before the learned First Appellate Court under Order IX of the C.P.C. His statement is taken on record. Prayer being genuine is allowed. The
instant appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan), Judge.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Smt. Gangi Devi & Ors.
- respondent
Gokal
Coram
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- CMP.M/474/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court