Disposed
Suraj Sharma v. Rakesh Kumar and Another
Himachal Pradesh HCCRMPM/699/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
of 2017. 25.10.2017 Present: Mr. I.S.…
What the court decided
AI extract
of 2017. 25.10.2017 Present: Mr. I.S.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Cr.MP(M) No. 699 of 2017.
25.10.2017 Present: Mr. I.S. Chandel, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner.
Ms. Ritu Raj Sharma, Advocate, for respondent No.1.
Mr. J.S. Guleria, Asstt. A.G. for respondent No. 2.
Cr.MP(M) No. 699 of 2017.
By medium of this application, the applicant/ petitioner has sought condonation of 55 days delay, which has crept up in filing of the revision. A perusal of the application, more particularly, the contents of paras 2 to 4 thereof would indicate sufficient cause which prevented the applicant/petitioner from filing the revision within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, the aforesaid delay is condoned. Application stands disposed of.
Criminal Revision be registered.
Cr.M.P.No. 562 of 2017
Certified copy of the judgment passed by learned
trial Magistrate be filed within two weeks. Application stands disposed of.
List the revision for admission on 8.11.2017.
October 25, 2017 (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) (GR) Judge
Applicant/Petitioner
Respondent No.1
Respondent No. 2
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court