The appellant stated instructions to withdraw the appeal. The High Court of Himachal Pradesh dismissed the appeal as withdrawn.
The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
RFA No. 321 of 2010.
Date of decision: 01.11.2017.
Randhir Singh …..Appellant/Plaintiff.
Versus Maheshwar Singh and others ….Respondents/Defendants.
| Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice T Whether approved for reporti |
arlok Singh Chauhan, Judge. ng?1 |
|
|---|---|---|
| For the Appellant : |
Mr.S.S.Mittal, Senior Advocate with Mr.Arvind Sharma, Advocate. |
|
| For the Respondents : | Mr.Bimal Gupta, Senior Advocate Mr.Vineet Vashistha, Advocate, respondents No.1, 2, 4 to 11. |
with for |
Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge (Oral).
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the appellant
states that he has instructions to withdraw the present appeal.
( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) 1st November, 2017. Judge. (krt)
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the Judgment ?
Randhir Singh
Maheshwar Singh and others
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
