The High Court of Himachal Pradesh disposed of three letters patent appeals by directing the appellants to pass fresh orders in compliance with relevant Rules and Regulations following the quashing of impugned judgments by the Writ Court.
Appellants directed to pass fresh orders as per Rules and Regulations; all appeals and pending applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
LPA No. 197 of 2010 a/w LPAs No. 287 of 2010 & 150 of 2011 Decided on: 10.12.2014
LPA No. 197 of 2010 H.P. Horticultural Produce Marketing & …Appellant. Processing Corporation Ltd. Versus Sh. Balbir Singh & another …Respondents. ............................................................................................................. LPA No. 287 of 2010 H.P. Horticultural Produce Marketing & …Appellant. Processing Corporation Ltd. Versus Sh. Vineet Kaushik & another …Respondents. ............................................................................................................. LPA No. 150 of 2011 H.P. Horticultural Produce Marketing & …Appellant. Processing Corporation Ltd. Versus Sh. Pradeep Sharma & others …Respondents.
Coram
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice. The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?
LPA No. 197 of 2010 For the appellant: Mr. P.D. Nanda, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma & Mr. Ramakant Sharma, Advocates, for respondent No. 1. Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Anup Rattan & Mr. M.A. Khan, Additional Advocate Generals, and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No. 2.
LPA No. 287 of 2010 For the appellant: Mr. P.D. Nanda, Advocate.
-: 2 :-
For the respondents: Nemo for respondent No. 1.
Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Anup Rattan & Mr. M.A. Khan, Additional Advocate Generals, and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No. 2.
LPA No. 150 of 2011 For the appellant: Mr. P.D. Nanda, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. P.P. Chauhan, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 and 2.
Mr. Shrawan Dogra, Advocate General, with Mr. Anup Rattan & Mr. M.A. Khan, Additional Advocate Generals, and Mr. J.K. Verma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondent No. 3.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (Oral)
LPA No. 197 of 2010
This Letters Patent Appeal is directed against the judgment and order, dated 26th July, 2010, passed by the Writ Court in CWP (T) No. 3036 of 2008, titled as Balbir Singh versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another, whereby the writ petition filed by the writ petitioner-respondent No. 1 herein came to be allowed (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned judgment").
-: 3 :-
LPAs No. 287 of 2010 & 150 of 2011
(Mansoor Ahmad Mir) Chief Justice
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge
December 10, 2014
( rajni )
H.P. Horticultural Produce Marketing & Processing Corporation Ltd.
Balbir Singh
Vineet Kaushik
Pradeep Sharma
Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
