This Bench disposed of CWP No.1421 of 2013 and all pending applications by following the judgment rendered by a Division Bench in CWP No.6 of 2014 (Union of India vs Kewal Krishan Indoria)
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA
CWP No.1421 of 2013
Date of decision: 10.12.2014
Union of India and another.
…..Petitioners.
Versus
Arvind Kumar Sharda and another.
….. Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Tarlok Singh Chauhan, Judge Whether approved for reporting?
For the petitioners: Mr. Ashok Sharma, Assistnat Solicitor General of India. For the respondents: Mr. Ajay Mohan Goel, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Respondent No.2 ex parte.
Mansoor Ahmad Mir, Chief Justice (oral)
It is contended that the case of the writ petitioners
is squarely covered in terms of the judgment rendered by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.6 of 2014 , titled as
Union of India and another versus Kewal Krishan Indoria
and another , decided on 23rd June, 2014.
( Mansoor Ahmad Mir ) Chief Justice December 10, 2014 ( Tarlok Singh Chauhan ) (rkv) Judge
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India and another versus Kewal Krishan Indoria and another, CWP No.6 of 2014Followed¶14
Union of India
Arvind Kumar Sharda
Mansoor Ahmad Mir
Tarlok Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
