Gian Chand v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner presented a contempt petition but did not press the matter. Liberty to approach respondents for grievance redressal was granted. Petition disposed.
What did the court decide?
Liberty to approach respondents for redressal of grievances granted. Petition disposed.
What the court decided
CWP(T) No. 11334 of 2008
5.03.2011 Present: Mr. K. B. Khajuria, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Ram Murti Bisht, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Vinod Thakur, Dy. A.G. for the respondents.
Learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the
present petition. However he seeks liberty to approach the respondents for redressal of his grievances. Liberty granted. Petition stands disposed of.
(Sanjay Karol), Judge. March 5, 2011 (PK)
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Unidentified Petitioner
- respondent
Respondents (Government/State)
Coram
Sanjay Karol
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWPOA/11334/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court