Dhrub Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
12685/2008 4.3.2011 Present: Mrs. Ranjana…
12685/2008 4.3.2011 Present: Mrs. Ranjana…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP (T) No. 12685/2008
4.3.2011 Present: Mrs. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Bisht, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents.
From the reply filed by the respondents, it is evident that petitioner’s representation is yet pending with the department. As prayed for by the learned counsel for the petitioner, direction is issued to the respondents to decide the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
With the aforesaid directions, the petition is
disposed of.
4th March, 2011 (Sanjay Karol), (C) Judge.
Petitioner
Respondents
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court