A.K.Sharma v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
13520/2008 4.3.2011 Present: Mr.Himant Negi…
13520/2008 4.3.2011 Present: Mr.Himant Negi…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CWP (T) No. 13520/2008 4.3.2011 Present: Mr.Himant Negi, Advocate, vice counsel for the petitioner. Mr.R.M.Bisht, Dy. Advocate General, for the respondents.
In view of the reply filed by the respondent-State, as is so prayed by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the present petition has become infructuous and the same is dismissed as such.
4th March, 2011 (Sanjay Karol), (C) Judge.
Petitioner (unnamed)
Respondent-State
Sanjay Karol
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court