Dola Ram v. Hpsfc
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner withdrew the writ petition, reserving liberty to file a fresh one after impleading junior colleagues as parties.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition after impleading junior colleagues.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP(T) No. 8587 of 2008. Decided on 6th December, 2010.
Dola Ram.
…Petitioner. -VersusH.P. State Forest Corporation Ltd. and others.
…Respondents.
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Bindiya Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) :
Ms. Bindiya Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after arraying those persons as party, who according to her, were junior to the petitioner, but rank senior in the seniority list. The question of limitation will not come in the way of petitioner in view of Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dola Ram
- respondent
H.P. State Forest Corporation Ltd.
Coram
Rajiv Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWPOA/8587/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court