Meena Ram v. Hpsfc
Case brief
What is this about?
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.…
HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP(T) No. 8586 of 2008. Decided on 6th December, 2010.
Meena Ram.
…Petitioner. -VersusH.P. State Forest Corporation Ltd. and others.
…Respondents.
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : Ms. Bindiya Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents. : Mr. Shashi Shirshoo, Advocate. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) :
Ms. Bindiya Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for and is permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty reserved to the petitioner to file a fresh petition after arraying those persons as party, who according to her, were junior to the petitioner, but rank senior in the seniority list. The question of limitation will not come in the way of petitioner in view of Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
(Rajiv Sharma) Judge
December 06, 2010.
(bhupender)
1 Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment?
Meena Ram
H.P. State Forest Corporation Ltd. and others
Rajiv Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court