Gulshan Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner failed to appear after the court called for the case twice. Judgment dismissed for non-prosecution.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to petitioner's failure to appear.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA.
CWP(T) No. 8329 of 2008. Decided on 3rd December, 2010.
Gulshan Kumar Kalia.
…Petitioner. -Versus-
State of Himachal Pradesh.
…Respondent.
Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?1
____________________________________________________________ For the petitioner. : None. For the respondent. : Mr. P.M. Negi, Deputy Advocate General with Mr. R.P. Singh, Assistant Advocate General.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Rajiv Sharma, Judge (Oral) :
Case was taken up in the morning session, however, none has appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Thereafter, the case has been taken up again at 12:55 P.M., but none has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner. Consequently, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Gulshan Kumar Kalia
- respondent
State of Himachal Pradesh
Coram
Rajiv Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Himachal Pradesh HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- CWPOA/8329/2008
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court