The High Court of Gujarat dismissed an application for regularizing late surrender. The court held that under the Prisons Act and Jail Manual, only the Jail Superintendent has the authority to condone delays or impose punishments for breach of conditions, not the court.
Application for regularizing late surrender dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/SCR.A/12431/2022 ORDER DATED: 28/11/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 12431 of 2022
================================================================
SHANABHAI VAGHABHAI @ VAGHJIBHAI ZALA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & 1 other(s)
================================================================ Appearance: THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR PRANAV TRIVEDI, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 28/11/2022
ORAL ORDER
Page 1 of 7
R/SCR.A/12431/2022 ORDER DATED: 28/11/2022
No.2884 of 2008 and the judgment of this Court dated 10.11.2017 in Criminal Misc. Application (for regularisation of late surrender) No.16444 of 2017 and allied matters to submit that the application is not maintainable since it is only the Jail Superintendent who has authority to condone the late surrender in accordance to the Jail Manual and the Prisons Act.
Page 2 of 7
R/SCR.A/12431/2022 ORDER DATED: 28/11/2022
to set aside subsequent punishment imposed under the Jail Manual nor can it regularise the default committed by the petitioners after the imposition of punishment. The Code of Criminal Procedure does not permit the Appellate Court granting suspension of sentence to set aside the subsequent offence committed under the Prisons Act for violation of the condition of suspension of the sentence passed in exercise of its power to grant temporary bail, and thus, held that the petitioners would be entitled to have condonation of delay in surrendering before the jail authority and the appropriate authority has to decide such questions in accordance with law if the aggrieved approaches such authority.
Page 3 of 7
R/SCR.A/12431/2022 ORDER DATED: 28/11/2022
the Coordinate Bench has observed that the said Section 48A does not distinguish between criminal prisoner and or convicted prisoner, and has held that, Section 48A would apply uniformly to both the class of prisoners, and therefore, observed that the under trial prisoner is committed to jail custody under warrant of the Court then such under trial prisoner are brought under the definition of criminal prisoner, to whom the provisions of Section 48A of the Prisons Act would apply.
"1287. In each case of later surrender or breach of any of the conditions of furlough or parole, the necessary punishment or punishments should be awarded by the Superintendent of Prison with due regard to the circumstances of each case. All the punishments mentioned below or in Section 48-A of the Prisons Act, 1894 need not necessarily be awarded in each case but it is left to the discretion of the Superintendent to decide which particular punishment or punishments should be awarded. If, in
Page 4 of 7
R/SCR.A/12431/2022 ORDER DATED: 28/11/2022
certain cases, the Superintendent is satisfied that the overstayal was for good or sufficient reasons, he may excuse the prisoner. However, before awarding any punishment, the Superintendent should invariably obtain a prison's explanation in each case of overstayal of period or breach of any conditions of furlough or parole :
(1) A maximum cut of 5 days's remission for each of overstay; Provided that where the prisoner has not sufficient remission to his credit, he shall cease to earn remission in future for such period as the Superintendent may direct;
(2) Stoppage of canteen concession for a period of not less than one month and not more than three months.
(3) Withholding concession of either interviews or letters or both, for a maximum period of three months.
(4) In cases of furlough, the furlough period not to be counted towards sentence.”
Page 5 of 7
R/SCR.A/12431/2022 ORDER DATED: 28/11/2022
circumstances of each case. The discretion is left to the Superintendent to decide which particular punishment or punishments should be awarded and the Superintendent comes to the conclusion that the overstayal of period or breach of any conditions of furlough or parole were on sufficient reason, he may in his discretion excuse the prisoner. The Superintendent therefore before awarding any punishment invariably has to obtain the prisoner explanation in each of the case of overstayal of period or breach of any conditions of furlough or parole.
Page 6 of 7
R/SCR.A/12431/2022 ORDER DATED: 28/11/2022
Superintendent to consider their prayer for condoning the late surrender, which the Jail Superintendent, in turn, has to consider the individual case in accordance to the provisions made under Clause 1287 of the Jail Manual. Hence, there is no reason to entertain this application.
Sd/- (GITA GOPI, J)
CAROLINE
Page 7 of 7
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a court can regularize a prisoner's late surrender when the proper authority is the Jail Superintendent.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vikas Narendrabhai v. State of Gujarat and anotherReferred¶14
Vikas Narendrabhai v. State of Gujarat and another in Criminal Misc. Application No.1360 of 2014
Akil Noormahmadbhai Kachara v. State of Gujarat and OthersReferred¶14
Criminal Appeal No.2884 of 2008
Akil Noormahmadbhai Kachara v. State of Gujarat and OthersReferred¶22
Criminal Misc. Application (for regularisation of late surrender) No.16444 of 2017
3 provisions across 2 enactments
SHANABHAI VAGHABHAI @ VAGHJIBHAI ZALA
STATE OF GUJARAT
GITA GOPI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
