Rejected application seeking long parole leave under Section 433A Cr.P.C. 1973 as jail remarks disclosed no such application for consideration.
Application stands rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
R/SCR.A/12183/2022 ORDER DATED: 25/11/2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 12183 of 2022
==========================================================
PUNAMBHAI ISWARBHAI TALAPADA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & 2 other(s)
========================================================== Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3 MR HARDIK MEHTA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 25/11/2022
ORAL ORDER
Long parole leave has been prayed stating
that the order has been passed in regard to
his application under Section 433A of the
Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The jail
remarks show that his prayer for long parole
leave has been rejected and the jail remarks
do not reflect any of the application for
consideration under Section 433A of the
Cr.P.C. There is no reason to entertain the
present application. Hence, the present
application stands rejected.
(GITA GOPI,J)
Maulik
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present application should be entertained when jail remarks do not reflect an application under Section 433A of Cr.P.C. 1973 for long parole leave.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
PUNAMBHAI ISWARBHAI TALAPADA
STATE OF GUJARAT
GITA GOPI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court