Allowed¶26

Smt. Biakthansangi v. Smt. Hautluangpuii and 2 Ors.

Gauhati HC4 Sept 2025I.A.(Civil)/98/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Stay of operation of Trial Court decree; interim relief; Heirship Certificate; LSC No. 253/1975; Dinthar-II, Aizawl, Mizoram; family/inheritance property dispute; connected RFA No. 25/2025; I.A.(Civil) No. 98/2025; unopposed application; Gauhati High Court; Marli Vankung, J.; order dated 05.09.2025; impugned Judgment & Order and Decree dated 05.06.2025.

What did the court decide?

Stay of the operation of the impugned Judgment & Order dated 05.06.2025 till the disposal of the connected RFA No. 25/2025; I.A. (Civil) No. 98/2025 allowed and disposed of. ¶26

Smt. Biakthansangi Vs Smt. Hautluangpuii and 2 Ors. — Gauhati HC (2025) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Page No.# 1/3

¶2

GAHC030003992025

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/98/2025

¶5

Smt. Biakthansangi W/o Lalthafela (L) R/o Dinthar Aizawl Mizoram

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

Smt. Hautluangpuii and 2 Ors. D/o Thangkhuma (L) R/o Dinthar Aizawl Mizoram

¶8

2:Smt. Lalremtluangi D/o Thangkhuma (L) R/o Chhingchhip Serchhip District Mizoram

¶9

3:Smt. Lalhmunsiami W/o Challianmawia (L) R/o Dinthar Aizawl Mizoram

¶10

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalfakawma Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. Jonathan Lalrintluanga for R1 & R3

¶11

Page No.# 2/3

¶12

Linked Case : RFA/25/2025

¶13

Smt. Biakthansangi W/o Lalthafela (L), R/o Dinthar, Aizawl, Mizoram VERSUS Smt. Hautluangpuii and 2 Ors. D/o Thangkhuma (L), R/o Dinthar, Aizawl, Mizoram 2:Smt. Lalremtluangi D/o Thangkhuma (L) R/o Chhingchhip Serchhip District Mizoram 3:Smt. Lalhmunsiami W/o Challianmawia (L) R/o Dinthar Aizawl Mizora

¶14

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Lalfakawma

¶15

Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. Jonathan Lalrintluanga for R1 & R3

¶16

B E F O R E

¶17

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER

¶18

05.09.2025

¶19

Mr. Lalfakawma, learned counsel for the applicant is present along

¶20

with Mr. Jonathan Lalhruaitluanga, learned counsel for the opposite party.

¶21

The learned counsel for the opposite party has prayed for stay of the operation of the impugned Judgment & Order dated 05.06.2025 and the Decree dated 05.06.2025, wherein the learned Trial Court had granted

¶22

Page No.# 3/3

¶23

Heirship Certificate to respondent No. 1 with regard to the property in LSC No. 253/1975, located at Dinthar-II, Aizawl, Mizoram.

¶24

The learned counsel for the respondents submits that they will not be filing any written objection.

¶25

In view of the above, as prayed for by the learned counsel for the applicant, the operation of the impugned Judgment & Order dated 05.06.2025 is stayed till the disposal of the connected RFA No. 25/2025.

¶26

Accordingly, I.A. (Civil) No. 98/2025 stands allowed and disposed of.

¶27

JUDGE

¶28

Comparing Assistant

Smt. Biakthansangi v. Smt. Hautluangpuii and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Biakthansangi v. Smt. Hautluangpuii and 2 Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sh. P.C. Lalthlamuana Vs Sh. Lalramhmachhuana and 7 Ors.

Sh. P.C. Lalthlamuana Vs Sh. Lalramhmachhuana and 7 Ors.

Hd Lalnunzira and 9 Ors. Vs Sh Khilli Ram Meena and 4 Ors.

New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs Sh Lalhmangaiha and Anr.

Mrs. Lalrozami Vs The State of Mizoram r/b. the Principal secretary, Finance Department and 5 Ors.

Sh. F.Lalhmachhuana and 122 Ors. Vs State of Mizoram and 23 Ors.