Mrs. Lalrozami Vs The State of Mizoram r/b. the Principal secretary, Finance Department and 5 Ors.

¶1

Page No.# 1/4

¶2

GAHC030001952025

¶3

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

¶4

Case No. : WP(C)/34/2025

¶5

Mrs. Lalrozami R/o Chawnpui, Aizawl, Mizoram

¶6

VERSUS

¶7

The State of Mizoram r/b. the Principal secretary, Finance Department and 5 Ors. Aizawl2:The Chief Controller of Accounts Accounts and Treasuries Aizawl Mizoram

¶8

3:The Director (P) Accounts and Treasuries Mizoram Aizawl

¶9

4:The Govt. of Mizoram r/b. the Secretary Transport Department Mizoram Aizawl

¶10

5:The Director Transport Department Mizoram Aizawl 6:The Treasury Officer Aizawl Sourth

¶11

Mizoram Aizaw

¶12

Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Jacinta Zothanmawii

¶13

Page No.# 2/4

¶14

Advocate for the Respondent : Addl. AG/GA, Mizoram for R1 - R6

¶15

B E F O R E

¶16

HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MARLI VANKUNG ORDER

¶17

08.09.2025

¶18

Heard Ms. Jacinta Zothanmawii, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also

¶19

heard Ms. Lalnunhlui, learned Govt. Advocate for the State respondents. Both the learned counsels submit that the parties have come to an amicable settlement through mediation and the case may therefore be disposed of.

¶20

2. This court finds that the instant writ petition was filed by the petitioner for the State respondents to sanction the release of the Family Pension of Late Mr. Chalthana to the petitioner, on the grounds that the petitioner was the legal wife of Late Mr. Chalthana even though her name was not entered in the family declaration by Late Mr. Chalthana, who had served as a peon under the Transport Department till his superannuation pension.

¶21

3. It is seen that the parties had come to an amicable settlement through mediation on 02.09.2025 wherein, the case was registered as mediation case No. 16/2025. The parties have come to an amicable settlement on the following

¶22

terms:

¶23

Page No.# 3/4

¶24

“The Respondent & The Petitioner agree that fresh application along with Form 14 for claim of pension of Pu Chalthana (L) be applied by Pi Lalrozami i.e. Petitioner and the same be procured. After much discussion and deliberations the parties agreed unanimously on the following:

¶25

i) Since Pi Lalrozami is not reflected in Form 3, Rules 54(12) of Details of Family Pu Chalthana as per CCS Pension Rules, 1972, the Petitioner, Pi Lalrozami shall submit fresh application for claim of Pension of Pu Chalthana(L) PPO NOMR/DAT/17/329 to the Director of Transport Department and the same shall be processed and forwarded to the Director(P), Local Fund Audit & Pension, Accounts and Treasuries Department, Chanmari ,Aizawl within 10(ten) days from the receipt of the application.

¶26

ii) The Director (P), Local Trust Fund, Audit and Pension, A&T shall examine the application of Lalrozami as per CCS(Pension) Rules, 1972 and determine whether Pi Lalrozami is eligible for family pension of Pu Chalthana(L) as per law.

¶27

The Director(P), Local Fund Audit and Pension, ATI shall process and examine the application with the utmost urgency and treat the matter as priority.

¶28

iii) All the information and correspondence regarding the above shall be addressed to Pi Jacinta Zothanmawii, Advocate Anlen Law Firm and counsel departments.”

¶29

Page No.# 4/4

¶30

4. This court finds the above terms of settlement arrived at by the parties to

¶31

be reasonable and acceptable in accordance with law.

¶32

5. Accordingly, the instant writ petition No. 34/2025 stands disposed of, on

¶33

the parties having come to an amicable settlement through mediation, as above.

¶34

JUDGE