Application under Section 151 CPC for restoration of a civil revision petition dismissed for default. Opposite party raised no objection. The High Court restored the revision petition to file and listed it for hearing.
CRP(IO) No. 108/2023 restored to file and listed for hearing on 05.03.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC010029242024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : MC/5/2024 In CRP(IO) No. 108/2023
HIRANYA KUMAR SARMA AND ANR
S/O LATE BALADEB SARMA, R/O BIDYAPUR, COLLEGE ROAD, NALBARI TOWN, WARD NO. 3, MOUZA-KHATA, P.S.-NALBARI, DIST-NALBARI, ASSAM
2: RIJUMONI SARMA W/O SRI HIRANYA KUMAR SARMA R/O BIDYAPUR COLLEGE ROAD NALBARI TOWN WARD NO. 3 MOUZA-KHATA P.S.-NALBARI DIST-NALBARI ASSA
VERSUS
ON THE DEATH OF SOLE PLAINTIFF, RAMESH BARMAN AND ORS HIS LEGAL HEIRS
2:SMTI BHANUMATI BARMAN W/O LATE RAMESH BARMAN R/O VILL-BARKURA P.O.-BALIKARIA MOUZA-BATAHGILA P.S.-NALBARI DIST-NALBARI ASSAM
3:KISHOR BARMAN S/O LATE RAMESH BARMAN R/O VILL-BARKURA
Page No.# 2/3
P.O.-BALIKARIA MOUZA-BATAHGILA P.S.-NALBARI DIST-NALBARI ASSAM 4:MANOJ KUMAR BARMAN S/O LATE RAMESH BARMAN R/O VILL-BARKURA P.O.-BALIKARIA MOUZA-BATAHGILA P.S.-NALBARI DIST-NALBARI ASSAM 5:TAPAN CH. BARMAN S/O LATE RAMESH BARMAN R/O VILL-BARKURA P.O.-BALIKARIA MOUZA-BATAHGILA P.S.-NALBARI DIST-NALBARI ASSAM 6:HITESH KR. BARMAN S/O LATE RAMESH BARMAN R/O VILL-BARKURA P.O.-BALIKARIA MOUZA-BATAHGILA P.S.-NALBARI DIST-NALBARI ASSAM 7:GITANJALI BARMAN D/O LATE RAMESH BARMAN R/O VILL-BARKURA P.O.-BALIKARIA MOUZA-BATAHGILA P.S.-NALBARI DIST-NALBARI ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH Advocate for the Respondent : MR. J DEKA
Page No.# 3/3
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
19-02-2024
Heard Mr. M. A. Sheikh, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. J. Deka, learned counsel appearing for the opposite party.
In as usual fairness, Mr. Deka, the learned counsel submits that he has no objection, if the aforesaid petition is admitted for hearing.
After hearing both sides, it is here by directed that CRP (IO) 108/2023 shall be restored to file and be listed on 05.03.2024 for hearing.
Misc. Case stands disposed of.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Should CRP(IO) No. 108/2023, dismissed for default on 06.02.2024, be restored to file under Section 151 CPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Hiranya Kumar Sarma
Rijumoni Sarma
Bhanumati Barman
Kishor Barman
Manoj Kumar Barman
Tapan Ch. Barman
Parthivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
