Counsel submitted that the criminal petition contained errors and sought to withdraw it; the High Court disposed of the petition on withdrawal with liberty to file afresh.
Petition permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file afresh.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010023252024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Crl.Pet./165/2024
BAHARUL ISLAM S/O IDRISH ALI R/O VILL- UTTAR KALJHAR, P.S. HOWLY, DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM
VERSUS
THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM
2:NAJIMA KHATUN D/O NAZRUL HOQUE R/O VILL- UTTAR KALJHAR P.S. HOWLY DIST. BARPETA ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA
Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM
BEFORE
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA
ORDER
16.02.2024
Heard Mr. N Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. D. Das, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam.
Mr. Ahmed has submitted that there are some errors in the petitioner and
Page No.# 2/2
therefore, he wanted to withdraw the same with liberty.
In view of the above, the present criminal petition is disposed of on withdrawal with liberty to file it afresh, if so advised.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Baharul Islam
The State of Assam rep. by the PP, Assam
Najima Khatun
Parthivjyoti Saikia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
