Disposed
Taj Uddin Laskar v. Dr. Nirada Devi and Anr.
Gauhati HCCont.Cas(C)/739/2019
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
GAHC010311962019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
What the court decided
AI extract
GAHC010311962019 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010311962019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/739/2019
TAJ UDDIN LASKAR
S/O- LATE MOTOFOR ALI LASKAR, R/O- VILL.- BAHADUR PUR PT(I), P.O. RANGAUTI, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM
VERSUS
DR. NIRADA DEVI AND ANR. DIRECTOR, SCERT, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19. 2:PRABATH RANJAN NATH IN-CHARGE PRINCIPAL DIET KARIMGANJ P.O. BAGBARI DIST.- KARIMGANJ ASSAM PIN- 788720
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F A LASKAR, MR. D H MOZUMDER
Advocate for the Respondent : SC, SCERT, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 16.08.2024 Mr. F.A. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions, has
Page No.# 2/2
submitted that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Accordingly, he has instructions not to press the matter.
The learned standing counsel for the SCERT is present.
Accordingly, the matter stands closed as not pressed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Taj Uddin Laskar
Dr. Nirada Devi and Anr.
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court