M/S Infotech Solution and Anr. v. Chetan Kumar Srivastava and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
A contempt petition against railway officials was closed after counsel for both sides reported that the underlying court order had been complied with.
A contempt petition against railway officials was closed after counsel for both sides reported that the underlying court order had been complied with.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010056642024
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/153/2024
M/S INFOTECH SOLUTION AND ANR
A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT SWAGOTA ENVISSION, 3RD FLOOR, DISTRICT - KAMRUP (M), ASSAM, BACKSIDE SIX MILE, G. S. ROAD, KHANAPARA, GUWAHATI - 781002. REPRESENTED BY ONE OF ITS PARTNERS SHRI PURANJOY NEOG.
2: PURANJOY NEOG S/O- SHRI RAMESWAR NEOG R/O- HOUSE NO. 62 NAYANTARA BYE LANE JANAKPUR GUWAHATI-781019 DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSA
VERSUS
CHETAN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA AND ANR GENERAL MANAGER, NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY, MALIGAON, GUWAHATI, PIN - 781011.
2:SANJAY KUMAR SINGH SENIOR DIVISIONAL SIGNAL AND TELECOM ENGINEER (GS) N.F. RAILWAY RANGIA ASSAM PIN- 781354
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. P BHOWMICK, MR. D THAOSEN,MR J LOTHA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. B CHAKRAVARTY,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER
Date : 12.08.2024
Mr. J. Lotha, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Chakravarty, learned counsel for all the respondents submit that the order has been complied with.
Accordingly, this contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
M/S INFOTECH SOLUTION
PURANJOY NEOG
CHETAN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
SANJAY KUMAR SINGH
MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court