The Gauhati High Court disposed of a contempt petition wherein counsel submitted that the impugned order had been complied with, leading to the closure of the petition without adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010226972023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/616/2023
GOBIND AGARWAL S/O- BAJRANG AGARWAL, R/O- VILLAGE FAKIRAGRAM, P.O- FAKIRAGRAM, P.S- FAKIRAGRAM, DIST- KOKRAJHAR (BTAD), ASSAM
VERSUS
GYANENDRA PRATAP SINGH AND ANR DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ASSAM, B.K KAKATY ROAD, ULUBARI, GUWAHATI-07
2:PUSHPARAJ SINGH IPS THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KOKRAJHAR ASSA
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. J I BORBHUIYA
Advocate for the Respondent : MS. M BARMAN (r-2)
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ::ORDER::
03.04.2024
Heard Mr. J. I. Borbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Ms. M. Barman, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 2 and Mr. D. Nath, learned counsel appearing for Respondent No. 1.
It is submitted at the bar that the order against which this contempt petition has been filed has already been complied with.
In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the counsels, nothing rise for adjudication in the present contempt petition and as such the contempt petition stands closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Gobind Agarwal
Gyanendra Pratap Singh
Kaushik Goswami
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
