Contempt petition closed after the petitioner, on instructions, stated that the court's order had been complied with and did not press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010226062019
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/579/2019
ACHYUT CHANDRA MAHANTA
S/O- LATE HARICHANDRA MAHANTA, R/O- AGSIA, P.S- AZARA, DISTKAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN- 781128
VERSUS
PREETOM SAIKIA
COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION DEPTT (ELEMENTARY), DISPUR, GUWAHATI, PIN- 781005
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR H BEZBARUA, MS. D SAIKIA
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D MOZUMDER, MR S M T CHISTIE,MR. D SAIKIA,MR. S BISWAS
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA
ORDER
Date : 16.08.2024
Mr. K. Kalita, learned counsel appearing on behalf of counsel on record for the petitioner has submitted that as per instruction received, the order of the Court has been complied with and he has instruction not to press the matter.
Accordingly, this contempt petition stands closed on such instructions.
Page No.# 2/2
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Achyut Chandra Mahanta
Preetom Saikia
Kalyan Rai Surana
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
