Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of an earlier writ order. The respondent produced a speaking order dated 08.08.2023 showing compliance; the court closed and disposed of the contempt case.
Contempt case closed and disposed of on production of compliance order dated 08.08.2023; copy to be furnished to petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010083562023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/353/2023
AROJ AL I AHMED S/O- LATE NOYMUDDIN, R/O- VILLAGE BHAGMARA, P.O- TOPARPATHAR, P.S- CHHAYGAON, DIST- KAMRUP, ASSAM, PIN-781337
VERSUS
MAMATA HOJAI AES, THE DIRECTOROF SECONDARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M A SHEIKH
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA
B E F O R E
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
06.03.2024
Heard Mr. M.A. Sheikh, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Page No.# 2/2
By placing the speaking order dated 08.08.2023, learned counsel Mr. S.M.T. Chistie submits that the order of this Court dated 07.03.2022 passed in WP(C) No. 1625/2022 has been duly complied with.
Accordingly, this contempt case stands closed and disposed of.
A copy of the order dated 08.08.2023 be furnished to the learned counsel for the petitioner by Mr. S.M.T. Chistie within the course of the day.
A copy of the order dated 08.08.2023 be kept on record and marked as document-D.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Aroj Al I Ahmed
Mamata Hojai
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
