Contempt petition regarding compliance with an earlier High Court order; counsel reported the respondent had complied, and the court closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010200572022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/551/2022
RUHUL AMIN LASKAR S/O- LATE ABDUL KAYUM LASKAR, VILLAGE- DAKSHIN SONAPUR PART-I, P.O. MATIJURI, P.S. AND DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
H N GAUTAM THE CHAIRMAN, DLC, HAILAKANDI CUM DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, HAILAKANDI, P.O., P.S. AND DISTRICT- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM. PIN- 788151.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A M BARBHUIYA
Advocate for the Respondent :
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
ORDER
Date : 10.05.2024
Ms. S.R. Mazarbhuiya, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondent has complied with the order passed by this Court.
Accordingly, this contempt petition is closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent had complied with the Court's order such that the contempt petition could be closed.
Ruhul Amin Laskar
H N Gautam, The Chairman, DLC, Hailakandi cum Deputy Commissioner, Hailakandi
Lanusungkum Jamir
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
