Disposed
Biswadeep Kar Purkayasta v. Suranjana Senapati
Gauhati HCCont.Cas(C)/52/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Contempt petition closed as respondent complied with court directions (para 13,16).
What the court decided
AI extract
Contempt petition closed as respondent complied with court directions (para 13,16).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010017962023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/52/2023
BISWADEEP KAR PURKAYASTA SON OF LATE BIDYUT KAR PURKAYASTA, RESIDENT OF S.S. SARANI, WARD NO.- IX, P.S. AND P.O.- LALA, DIST.- HAILAKANDI, ASSAM, PIN- 788163.
VERSUS
SURANJANA SENAPATI C/O- OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, ASSAM, KAHILIPARA, KAMRUP(M), GUWAHATI- 19.
Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R A CHOUDHURY
Advocate for the Respondent : MR S M T CHISTIE
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
ORDER
Date : 08.05.2024
Mr. R. A. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the directions passed by this Court.
Page No.# 2/2
Mr. S. M. T. Chistie, learned counsel appears for the sole respondent.
Contempt petition is accordingly closed.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
BISWADEEP KAR PURKAYASTA
SURANJANA SENAPATI
LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court