Contempt petition regarding compliance with a prior court order on provincialisation of the petitioner's service. The respondent produced an order dated 26 September 2023 rejecting her claim; the court held that substantial compliance had been made and closed the contempt petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010037122022
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/109/2022
SIRIN AKTAR CHOUDHURY
W/O JAKIR HUSSAIN LASKAR, R/O VILL-APPIN PART-II, P.O.-APPIN, DISTHAILAKANDI, ASSAM
VERSUS
DR. BIJAYA CHOUDHURY
DIRECTOR, ELEMENTARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, KAHILIPARA, GUWAHATI-19
Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. B AHMED
Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE LANUSUNGKUM JAMIR
ORDER
Date : 10.05.2024
Heard Mr. M. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the sole
respondent, has produced an order dated 26th September, 2023 issued by the Director of Elementary Education, Assam, by which the claim of the petitioner
Page No.# 2/2
for provincialisation of her service has been rejected.
In that view of the matter, this Court is of the considered opinion that the substantial compliance has been made to the order passed by this Court. Accordingly, the Contempt Petition is closed.
The order dated 26th September, 2023 is placed on record.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
1 issue framed by the court
Whether substantial compliance had been made with the Court's earlier order, given the Director of Elementary Education rejected the petitioner's claim for provincialisation of service.
Sirin Aktar Choudhury
Dr. Bijaya Choudhury
Lanusungkum Jamir
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
