Contempt petition alleging non-compliance of a High Court order in WP(C) No.4234/2017 was closed after counsel for the alleged contemners showed that the order dated 26.09.2019 had been duly complied with by order dated 03.12.2019.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC010046002020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/131/2020
ALPANA DAS MAZUMDAR
W/O- SRI SUDHANGSHU DAS, SUBJECT TEACHER, ALGAPUR PUBLIC HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL, P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR, DIST.HAILAKANDI, ASSAM.
VERSUS
PREETOM SAIKIA, I.A.S. AND 3 ORS. THE COMM. AND SECY., SECONDARY EDUCATION DEPTT., DISPUR, GHY.06.
2:PHANINDRA JIDUNG THE DIRECTOR OF SECONDARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GHY.-19.
3:RAJIV KUMAR JHA INSPECTOR OF SCHOOLS HAILAKANDI DISTRICT CIRCLE HAILAKANDI. PIN- 788151.
4:ABDUL JALIL BARBHUIYA PRESIDENT SCHOOL SELECTION COMMITTEE ALGAPUR PUBLIC HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL PIN- 788151 P.O. KALIBARI BAZAR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM
Advocate for the Petitioner : MRS. R DEVI
Page No.# 2/2
Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (R1, R2)
BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE
O R D E R
12.02.2024.
None appears for the petitioner on call.
Mr. S.M.T. Chistie, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the alleged contemner/respondent Nos.1 & 2, placed a copy of the order dated 03.12.2019 and submits that the order of this Court dated 26.09.2019, passed in the WP(C) No.4234/2017 has been duly complied with.
Accordingly the contempt petition stands closed.
The copy of the order dated 03.12.2019 be kept in the record by marking it as capital ‘X’.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant
Alpana Das Mazumdar
Preetom Saikia, I.A.S.
Phanindra Jidung
Rajiv Kumar Jha
Abdul Jalil Barbhuiya
Kardak Ete
As recorded by the court registry
Proceedings for wilful disobedience of a court order under the Contempt of Courts Act 1971.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
